Circular UrbanismInterventions for Urban Circular Ecosystems In Collaboration with Amber Peiying Han
Advisor: Keller Easterling
Location: New York; Austin; Vancouver
Yale School of Architecture, Thesis
Introduction Circular
Urbanism explores the existing networks and ecosystems within critical reuse
infrastructure and how building materials move through them.
The adaptive
reuse of buildings and the salvage of their components have continually evolved
through innovations in design and technology, yet the broader network of
recycled materials and infrastructure is equally important but less explored.
As more cities focus on densification with the goal of creating a more
sustainable and circular model of material consumption, the built environment is
being utilized as a material bank with the potential to support future development
and to minimize carbon footprint.
Global C&D Debris Percentage
US C&D Debris Percentage
The project
begins with comparative urban analysis* and leads to site-specific interventions.
Three North American cities—Vancouver, Austin, and New York—serve as
experimental grounds, each at different stages of their transition toward “circular
city”, and requiring distinct approaches. In Vancouver, a sustainable housing
densification model was developed to address the city’s housing crisis and
account for the material lifecycle. In Austin, material storage facilities have
been reimagined as market destinations that reflect the city’s ebb and flow of
construction activities. In New York City, three temporary installations were
designed as educational platforms, strategically located in pocket spaces to
maximize exposure to circular materials and reuse strategies. By applying
hierarchical strategies (S⊆M⊆L) across different scales, this
research proposes improved material flows based on each city’s context, reuse
policies, and established infrastructure.
The three maps highlight key infrastructure locations that are essential
to the building material recycling process in three selected cities. The
critical steps in material circulation include transport, storage, processing,
marketplace activities, reuse practices, and salvage from deconstruction.
Left:Material Circulation Cycle; Right:Hierarchical Interventions
Existing Infrastructure in Three Cities
Methodology Precedents Catalog
Phase 1: Precedents Study
The research begins by examining city-wide initiatives and circular material practices in architecture, including visits to cities in Belgium and the Netherlands, which are known for successful examples of circular design. The identified precedents are categorized by their role across the construction value chain.
Phase 2: Urban Analysis
Three North American cities—New York, Austin, and Vancouver—were selected for further analysis using a framework derived from previous research. Each city was examined in five key aspects: the state of deconstruction and salvage practices, the network of waste transportation, the number and types of processing facilities, examples of material reuse, and the market environment for salvaged materials.
Phase 3: Intervention Designs
Three proposals have been developed based on the current state of each city, with the intention of facilitating a shift toward circular construction practices.
Map of C&D Debris InfrastructureExisting Infrastructure Existing Circulation
NYC Existing C&D Debris Circulation Design Intervention Temporary Material Showroom Proposed C&D Debris CirculationNew Material Flow
Temporary Showroom Temporary Display Shelf Small Lot Intervention
Urban Section-Circular Interventions
AustinM: Material Marketplace & Storage Austin ordinances require general contractors to reuse or recycle at least 50% of construction and demolition debris, fostering collaboration between deconstruction and recycling facilities. Additionally, the city has established online networks and physical marketplaces for reusing small objects, materials, and furniture.
Building on this strong foundation, Austin’s circular network can be further strengthened with dedicated material storage and marketplaces for building components. These spaces can be built near existing reuse stores and recycling facilities, reducing material transportation distances and creating a centralized reuse destination. Architecturally, the building is designed to adapt to typical warehouse steel structures, incorporating recycled items as partitions or enclosures while displaying them for sale. The material inventory itself shapes the building, serving as a dynamic representation of the city’s ongoing reuse efforts.Austin Circular Economy Stody MapCenter for Maximum Potential
Urban Analysis
Map of C&D Debris Infrastructure
Existing Infrastructure
Existing Circulation
Austin Existing C&D Debris Circulation
Design Intervention Material Marketplace & Storage
Proposed C&D Debris Circulation
New Material Flow
Storage of Renew Fabric & Lumber (1/2)
Storage of Renew Fabric & Lumber (2/2)
Brick Wall (1/2)
Brick Wall (2/2)
Storage of Reclaimed Window (1/2)
Storage of Reclaimed Window (2/2)
Section-Material Marketplace & Storage
Vancouver
L: Community Land Trust Development Model Of the three selected sites, Vancouver stands out for its proactive reuse of construction materials, driven by its abundant wood resources, mature lumber reuse market, and policies that equalize the costs of demolition and deconstruction. The city exemplifies those with advanced urban recycling infrastructure and strong circular policies. However, Vancouver faces a severe housing shortage due to limited land availability, rising housing costs, and gentrification. As the city revises zoning and explores strategies to densify single-family neighborhoods, we propose a housing development model based on collaborative ownership through community land trusts*.
This model empowers residents to decide how to develop the land and benefit from densification, while enabling planned deconstruction and reuse of building components on-site under community oversight. Temporary material storage facilities are established during construction, facilitating material exchange between communities. After development, these spaces can transition into material marketplaces or other community amenities, ensuring the continued circulation of recycled materials across different land trust communities.
Unbuilders Salvage Vancouver
* Community Land Trust System
Community: Single-family house owners who live within a specific geographic area agree to develop collaborative ownership of the land and decide what to build on top.
Land: The CLT retains the land, taking it off the real estate market and planing it under community control through nonprofit organization. Lot size and function can be planned and determine by the community members.
Buildings: Apartment buildings and townhouses are constructed, with each community member owning two or more properties. Members can move into the new apartments and lease their other properties for rental income or development.
Materials: The CLT plans and control the deconstruction and construction process of the buildings, materials can be sorted, recycled, stored, and reuse on site.